Replacing older small apartment buildings may erode affordability

October 14, 2016 | By

Small multifamily properties —  which can be a key source of affordable rental units in many places —  face an uncertain future, according to the latest Multifamily Market Commentary from Fannie Mae.

“Multifamily rental units can be found in high-rise structures or in garden-style buildings, but there are a number of properties that house between just five and 50 housing units,” explains Tanya Zahalak, senior multifamily economist in Fannie Mae’s Multifamily Economics and Market Research (MRG) Group.

“These properties are usually identified as small multifamily and can be found in many different metros across the country.”

The MRG report expects the nation’s multifamily housing stock to see an influx of properties with higher numbers of units. Since older small multifamily properties they are replacing frequently offer more affordable rents, that could upset affordability in many markets going forward.

“As older small multifamily rental properties age and/or fall into disrepair, they will likely be replaced with properties with more density per square foot,” the Fannie Mae commentary says.

“Developers will likely create more —  but much smaller and more expensive – units on the same size lot.”

Read more: Even in the best of times for apartment rentals, there can be too much in the pipeline

California Has More to Lose

Zahalak notes that small multifamily is a property type that can have a big impact in a lot of metros. But the impact of this trend will hit some parts of the country harder than others because the stock is unevenly distributed.

Estimates from CoStar and CreditFi put the number of small multifamily properties nationwide at between roughly 300,000 and 330,000. Those buildings provide an estimated 3.5 million to 4.4 million housing units.

However, according to CoStar, California accounts for nearly 99,000 of those properties —  about one-third of the entire national supply. New York claims a 14 percent share, with 37,000 small properties, followed by Illinois and Florida, with some 14,000 properties each.

Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Wyoming are at the bottom of the pack, each home to fewer than 500 small multifamily properties.

Counting by city, Los Angeles has the lion’s share by far with 51,100 properties with a whopping 637,500 units, according to CoStar estimates. Rounding out the top five are New York City (30,800), San Francisco-Oakland (15,100), Chicago (12,800), and San Diego (9,900).

Read more: A Louisiana builder shares why homes in his area are in short supply

Challenges Despite Brisk Lending

“Lending has been brisk for small multifamily,” notes Zahalak, with CreditFi estimating loan values as high as $120 billion last year. “All types of lenders are providing financing,” she says, “including private individuals and sellers.”

“But even though loan volume looks robust, there are some challenges around preservation of this type of property,” says Zahalak. “Construction is starting to slow, while properties have been getting larger. In fact, the average number of units per construction project as of the second quarter of 2016 was an estimated 117,” according to the Dodge Data & Analytics Construction Pipeline.

“Given the high land and construction costs in most metros, this trend of maximizing square footage in multifamily development, rehabilitation, and renovation should not be surprising,” says the MRG multifamily report.

“Unfortunately, it does have implications for the small multifamily segment, which in many places tends to offer more affordable rents when compared to newer properties.”

 

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae’s Multifamily Economics and Market Research Group (MRG) included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae’s business prospects or expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the MRG bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current, or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the MRG represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.

 

 

comments

COMMENTING POLICY

 

We appreciate and encourage lively discussions on our websites’ content. While we value openness and diverse points of view, all comments should be appropriate for people of all ages and backgrounds. We do not tolerate and will remove any comment that does not meet standards of decency and respect, including, but not limited to, posts that:

  • are indecent, hateful, obscene, defamatory, vulgar, threatening, libelous, profane, harassing, abusive, or otherwise inappropriate
  • contain terms that are offensive to any group based on gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexual orientation
  • promote or endorse a product, service, or vendor
  • are excessively repetitive, constitute “SPAM” or solicitation, or otherwise prevent a constructive dialogue for others
  • are factually erroneous or misleading
  • threaten the privacy rights of another person
  • infringe on intellectual property and proprietary rights of another, or the publication of which would violate the same
  • violate any laws or regulations

We reserve complete discretion to block or remove comments, or disable access privilege to users who do not comply with this policy. The fact that a comment is left on our website does not indicate Fannie Mae’s endorsement or support for the content of the comment.

Fannie Mae does not commit to reviewing all information and materials submitted by users of the website for consideration or publication by Fannie Mae (“User Generated Contents”). Personal information contained in User Generated Contents is subject to Fannie Mae’s Privacy Statement available here. Fannie Mae shall have otherwise no liability or obligation with respect to User Generated Contents and may freely copy, adapt, distribute, publish, or otherwise use User Generated Contents without any duty to account.

A Window Into Housing In America

Subscribe to our newsletter for each week's top stories. Enter your email address below to stay in the know.